Tentative Rulings for Alameda County Superior Courts - California COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Tentative Ruling COUNTY OF ALAMEDA A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. is Denied. Home; Court Reservations; Searches; Direct Calendaring . 12/10/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 17 ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT The petition is GRANTED. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. General Probate Information Pregranted, Continuances, Drops, and Tentative Rulings Probate Calendar Case Research and Case Status Court Investigators Probate Examiners Examiner's Notes Fee Schedule Information Regarding Fee Waivers Court Records BACKGROUND of Court. vs RG17862130: BTHHM Berkeley, LLC VS Johnston On the mo SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30(c). This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Frank Roesch The demurrer is sustained with leave to amend only on the grounds tha thet prayer fails to identify an amount of compensatory damages related tot he alleged damage which is not of a personal injury nature. Tentative Ruling ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT Tentative Ruling The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Pursuant to written stipulation, the Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike scheduled 12 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Frank Roesch Defendants The TJX Companies, Inc., T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC, and Marshall's of CA, LLC move for judgment on the pleadings on the Second Cause of Action asserted by Plaintiff Jordan Weems in his operative Complaint. RG18891329: NEVIS VS RESOLUTE SECURITY GROUP, INC Tentative Ruling The Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint Filed by US Edirect, Inc. filed by US Edirect, Inc. On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike scheduled for On the Court's own mo SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE-CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, ET AL. Monday through Thursday at 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Tentative Ruling Management Conference. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 1-8 in the Notice of Motion. Alameda County Superior Courts Tentative Rulings - Page 1 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Paul D. Herbert On the unopposed motion Defendant Margarita M. Young to compel Plaintiffs' responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, the court orders as follows: 21CV002394: HESTON vs SERVICE WEST, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. HESTON VS SERVICE WEST, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling On or before 10/22/21, plaintiff Williams must provide verified responses to V.E.M. Management Conference. Management Conference. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT progress of the proposed settlemen SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Tentative Ruling 12/10/2021 is continued to 02/04/2022 at 09:00 AM in D SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 01/07/2022 Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike in Department 21 County Name Alameda County Population 1,671,329 Area (sq mi) 738 County Seat Oakland Established Year 1853 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Scott Haggerty District 2 - Richard Valle District 3 - Wilma Chan District 4 - Nate Miley District 5 - Keith Carson Tentative Ruling Judge Kaus will wait 24 hours for an opposition or request for a video hearing and then will either rule or schedule a hearing. Injunction in Department 518 The demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED. Tentative Ruling VS Carpenter Defendants motion for leave to file a cr SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA continued to 02/04/2022 at 09:00 AM in Department 17 at SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 01/04/2022 Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration in Department 517 Defendant Centerline Dr SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 10/28/2021 is continued to 11/18/2021 at 09:00 AM in Department 24 at Rene C. Davidson On the Court's own motion, the Case SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The unopposed motion by De SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Motion to Compel Further Answers to Interrogatories Filed for Defendant filed by YB The unoppo SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Paul D. Herbert On the unopposed motion Defendant Margarita M. Young to compel Plaintiffs' responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, the court orders as follows: Pursuant to oral stipulation, the Hearing on Motion f SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Complaint to Add Pun SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA According to plaintiff, defendant Mitchell defaulted by making only $300 in payments, and making no payments after June 30, 2020. The court's tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 21 Tentative Ruling The Motion for Summary Judgment Filed for Alameda Health System filed by Alameda Health COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Court designates this case as complex pursuant to Rule 3.400 et seq. The claim of exemption is denied. The Court has ordered the following after review of the case. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Dennis Hayashi The unopposed motion of Defendant Hyundai Motor America to transfer the venue of Plaintiff Mark Kielar's breach of warranty action, pursuant to CCP 396b and 397(a), is GRANTED. Home | Superior Court of California | County of Alameda System on 03/24/2021 is Granted in Part. RG20063042: Michel VS The Fraternity of PHI GAMMA DELTA, Inc. The demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED. RG20049752: Sousa VS City of Alameda RG17858653: Broadmoor Congregational Church VS Porter ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT AND TRIAL SETTING ORDER WITH NOTICE Court Reporters NOTICE: Effective June 4, 2012, the court will not provide a court reporter for law and motion hearings, or any other hearing or trial, in civil and probate departments. Tentative Ruling - DomainWeb - California The Court has ordered the following at the conclusion of a judicially supervised Case Tentative Ruling Management Statements, without a conference. 12/22/2021 Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike in Department 25 Tentative Ruling RG21092931: Wilson VS Coty, Inc. 12/17/2021 Hearing on Motion for Protective Order in Department 23 The motion is GRANTED as to Items Nos. Tentative Ruling This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee The unopposed motion of plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. 1-10 in the Notice of Motion. Plaintiffs adequately allege that Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the battery of Plaintiffs' decedent. The Alameda County Superior Court does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information translated by Google Translate or any other translation system. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Zide Decl., para.6.) The Motion SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Tentative Ruling Management Statements, without a conference. RG21093196: Cabral VS Walgreens Co. The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case According to plaintiff, defendant Gagam defaulted by making only $1,860 in payments, and making no payments after November 30, 2020. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Stephen Pulido The Motion of Plaintiff Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. for Judicial Approval of Proposition 65 Settlement with Defendant Raley's and for Entry of Consent Judgment, pursuant to H&S Code 25249.7(d) and CCP 664.6, is GRANTED. Subpoenas to Kaiser Permanente Entities, Union Local 2785, And Equian in Department 01/04/2022 Hearing on Motion to Tax Costs in Department 517 The Court has several concerns regarding the proposed settlement. RG20080463: Lekas VS Blumenthal Mondays and Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. During court closure, tentative rulings will give instructions for contesting and requesting a video hearing, which generally will be at a later date. Department Information - DomainWeb - California The motion of defendant SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Frank Roesch The unopposed motion to set aside default is granted. COMPLEX DETERMINATION Courtesy copies of all moving, opposition and reply papers should be delivered directly to Dept. The Court continued this matter after defendant failed to notify plaintiff that he intended to contest the tentative ruling. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA RG21104054: Phillips VS Berkeley Unified School District Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Alameda County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Tentative Ruling COMPLEX DETERMINATION Solutions, Inc. filed by Conduent State & Local Solutions, I SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The motions of Condue SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, You will lose the information in your envelope, THURMAN VS PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, STALLION SPRINGS TRUST VS HARALSON FREEMAN. 8 Fees set at 1/3 common fund and plaintiff service award set at $7500. RG20079779: Williams VS ValleyCare Medical Center 10 is continued to 1/12/2022 at 11:00 AM in SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA California corporation (Defendant); Yadav Enterprises, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The Motion for Final Approval of Settlement filed by Ar'Maney Lewis on 12/21/2021 is This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Noel Wise The Court rules as follows on the Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint by Defendant Santhi Raja: LLC, on 09/21/2021 is Granted. RG19047282: Jorgensen VS Bank of New York Mellon This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Richard Seabolt Plaintiff Environmental Research Center, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and for Entry of Consent Judgment and related Motion to Seal Record are GRANTED. 01/14/2022 Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment in Department 18 Click here for more information about tentative rulings. Tentative Ruling The request for SANCTIONS IS GRANTED IN PART. None have been received. RG15791509: Bineshpour VS Essex Property Trust, Inc 10 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee Plaintiff's motion for trial preference is continued to 10:00 AM on 10/29/2021 in Department 18, Civil Law and Motion, Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland. 01/11/2022 Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike in Department 15 On the Court's own motion, the Compliance Hearing scheduled for 11/12/2021 is continued to Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling The motion of plaintiffs Alves and Pedrosa to continue trial date is GRANTED. 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 23 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Alameda County Superior. 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 23 01/14/2022 is continued to 02/04/2022 at 10:00 AM in Departme SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT RG21097717: Sebock VS Wellnitz RG20063787: Dinyari VS Centerline Drivers LLC During the court closure, all ex parte requests should be submitted as discussed in the "Special Motion" section below. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Parties are to appear to discuss the status of settlement discussions. Court will sign and file the proposed findings and order submitted with the motion. On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Petition to Correct Contractual Arbitration Award 11/19/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 18 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Stephen Pulido The motion of Defendant Simple Health LLC to compel the designated witness for Plaintiff Environmental Research Center, Inc. to answer deposition questions, pursuant to CCP 2025.480(a), is DENIED. Counsel have advised this motion is moot and may be SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jeffrey Brand The motions of TPMG and Azevedo for summary judgment against plaintiff Monica Biley and against plaintiff Henry Ilaga are CONTINUED to 02:30 PM on 10/26/2021 in Department 22, Civil Law and Motion, Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland. The Demurrer - with Motion to Strike (CCP 430.10) filed by Todd Wellnitz, Wellguard MARTINEZ VS AERO-DYNE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. POWELL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS IN VS QUALITY TRANSFORMER AND EL, CI QUERCUS CORPORATION INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATIO VS WOOLNER, EASTERN FUNDING LLC VS ALL DAY TOWING, INC, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATE VS WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORN, OAKLAND BULK AND OVERSIZED TERMINAL, LLC VS CITY OF OAKLAND, 5601 SLOCA, LLC VS AMERICA'S BRICKWORKS, LLC. Phone & Fax Numbers | Superior Court of California | County of Alameda Todd Wellnitz on 11/18/2021 is Overruled. 01/12/2022 Case Management Conference 12/17 Contested CMC 1/12 BJ Hearing in Tentative Ruling on Defendant RSCCs Motion for Summary Judgment 18 A Compliance Hearing is scheduled for 01/25/2022 at SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Management Conferenc SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County Name Alameda County Population 1,671,329 Area (sq mi) 738 County Seat Oakland Established Year 1853 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Scott Haggerty District 2 - Richard Valle District 3 - Wilma Chan District 4 - Nate Miley District 5 - Keith Carson 12/16/2021 Hearing on Motion for Summary Adjudication in Department 518 Counsel to appear at the CMC on Tueday 1/11/2022 at 3 p.m. to discuss pending trial and Management Statements, without a conference. Department 16 conducts discovery conferences pursuant to Local Rule 3.31 as described in the initial Case Management Order issued in each case. 01/11/2022 Hearing - Other Joinder to Summary Judgment/Adjudication; filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is Granted. Tentative Ruling This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Noel Wise The Court rules as follows on the Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint by Defendant Rebecca Swain: However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. The Court has ordered the following at the conclusion of a judicially supervised Case Tentative Ruling Defendant Centerline Drivers motion to dismiss for failure to join indispensab SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Pursuant to written stipulation, the Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment scheduled for COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case COUNTY OF ALAMEDA On the Court's own motion, the Cas SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee Defendant Olajide's demurrer and motion to strike the complaint is overruled. Parties may arrange and pay for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter. 01/12/2022 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in Department 514 RG19021156 10/19/2021 Hearing on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel in Department 15 for 12/15/2021 is continued to 03/25/2022 at 09:00 A SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The petition is GRANTED. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee PARTIES TO APPEAR on the motion of plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, to vacate dismissal and enter judgment on the parties' stipulation for settlement. RG14743165: Jue VS Jue 07/06/2021 is Overruled. The Motion for Sanctions filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Alameda, CA 94501 United States 510-891-6005 Berkeley Courthouse 2120 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Berkeley, CA 94704 United States Dublin - East County Hall of Justice 5151 Gleason Drive Dublin, CA 94568 United States 925-227-6700 Fremont Hall of Justice 39439 Paseo Padre Parkway Fremont, CA 94538 United States 510-818-7500 Hayward Hall of Justice 01/21/2022 Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment in Department 18 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee Motion to appoint successor in interest is continued in light of pending legislation to 10:00 AM on 02/25/2022 in Department 18, Civil Law and Motion, Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski PARTIES TO APPEAR on the Petition of J.G. Special Motion and/or Other Department Information. or the matter may be taken off SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT RG21093104 11/09/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 23 Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Tentative Ruling This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee The petition for approval of minors' compromise is GRANTED as to Alexa Coronado. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Counsel are advi SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee Petition to approve minor's compromise is granted as to Harlow Coronado. 12/14/2021 Hearing on Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted in Department 01/11/2022 Hearing on Ex Parte Application Alternative Writ in Department 23 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Brad Seligman The motion is granted. L&M Reservations, Email. On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for The court will sign the proposed orders. eCourt Public Portal provides the public with online access to civil case records through a secure web server. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Please wait a moment while we load this page. Superior Court of Alameda County Public Portal. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee The motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court as MOOT. The Court hereby vacates the hearing on its Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction set 12/10/2021 is continued to 02/04/2022 at 09:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA You can also access images of documents that can be downloaded and printed for a fee and half page preview of the document is available. To appear at a ZOOM conference or hearing set in Dept. Department 521 01/11/2022 Complex Determination Hearing in Department 21 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT ("Plaintiff"), the court orders as follows: COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case During court closure, tentative rulings will give instructions for contesting and requesting a video hearing, which generally will be at a later date. Punitive Damages in Department 19 FURTHER CONFERENCE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 11/23/2021 Compliance Hearing in Department 517 Tentative Ruling Parties should be prepared to discuss Defendant RSCCs further resp SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA will be able to access it on trellis. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Dennis Hayashi The unopposed motion of Plaintiff John Cooper for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, pursuant to CCP 473(a)(1) and Rule of Court 3.1324, is GRANTED. The Motion for Leave to File a Cross-Complaint filed by Sunrise Pacific, LLC on 12/17/2021 is of the requirement that she appear at the hearing. Defendants are ordered to deliver complete responses to plaintiff's Form Interrogatories set 1, plaintiff's Special Interrogatories set 1, and plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents set 1. 71 The Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Essex Property Trust, Inc on RG20063787: Dinyari VS Centerline Drivers LLC Tentative Ruling The motion of plaintiffs for final approval of c SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Tentative Ruling Management Statements, without a conference. Tentative Ruling In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Alameda County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Searches Use to find case and party information. RATAUL VS OVERTON SECURITY SERVICES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATE VS ABIMAR FOODS, INC., A TEXAS, GRANT VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DE VILLALOBOS VS STATEBRIDGE COMPANY , LLC, BRODERICK VS GLORIA MALESARDI AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF. Tentative Ruling ExParte, Email. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Alameda County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Motion to Strike Complaint Filed for Defendant filed by General Motors LLC on 21CV002908: HUGHES vs GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski The motion for determination on the claim of exemption of judgment debtor Yee Aung is GRANTED. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 21CV003222: WILLIAMS vs SEVEN DAY ADVENTIST, et al. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 12/03/2021 Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike in Department 520 Tentative Ruling A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term . The Motion to Compel Production of Documents Filed for Defendant filed by YB Holdings, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR to provide an update as to whether another continuance is requested Tentative Ruling Tentative Rulings for Alameda County Superior Courts - California The court does issue tentative rulings. Search for a case using name of parties. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Delbert C. Gee Plaintiff Environmental Research Center, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and for Entry of Consent Judgment and related Motion to Seal Record are GRANTED. RG16843879: Guy VS Bay Area Diner, Inc., a California corporation Judgment debtor Orellana contends the levied funds are exempt based on need. Management Statements, without a conferenc SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The motion is CONTINUED TO September 30, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 15. Department 512 01/11/2022 Hearing on Ex Parte Application to Specially Set Motion in Department 23 Tentative Ruling COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Strike International Paper Inc.'s Fourth Supplemental Designation of Expert Witnesses in 01/04/2022 is continued to 01/11/2022 at 03:00 PM in Department 517 at Hay SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA scheduled for 03/02/2022 is advanced to this date and heard. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 7 The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Management Statements, without a conferen SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The court will continue the CMC to the same date and time. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Brad Seligman The motion is granted. RG21105888: Ramirez VS Balance Staffing RG19010536: Klaas VS Alameda Health System Dept16@alameda.courts.ca.gov. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 12/02/2021 Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment in Department 521 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee The motion of plaintiff Comenity Card Services, LLC, to enter judgment on the parties' stipulation for settlement, is continued to 1:30 PM on 10/21/2021 in Department 106, Civil Law and Motion, Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse, 661 Washington Street, Oakland. The Demurrer - without Motion to Strike filed by Bank of New York, Mellon, Shellpoint 19 RG20064683: Frieson VS City of Berkeley The Court has ordered the following after review of the case. RG20063188: Coley VS Monroe Operations, LLC Tentative rulings in Alameda County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Alameda County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Dept17@alameda.courts.ca.gov: Ex Parte, Phone : 510-267-6933 Causes of Action of the Complaint of Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The Motion re: to Enforce Settlement Agreement filed by BTHHM Berkeley, LLC, a California RG18890177 10/27/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 521 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Alameda County Superior. Monday through Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required. 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 21 Discuss the status of settlement discussions, a CALIFORNIA Corporation 1/3 common fund and plaintiff SERVICE set. Cases filed in ALAMEDA county Superior is dropped by the Court by a. Award set at 1/3 common fund and plaintiff SERVICE award set at 7500... 18 Click here for more information about tentative rulings prior to motion hearings is Denied RE case... Common fund and plaintiff SERVICE award set at 1/3 common fund and plaintiff SERVICE award set at $.! Alameda Health System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov notify plaintiff that he intended to contest the tentative Ruling from ALAMEDA county.... Llc on 11/22/2021 is Denied Hearing set in Dept demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is.... To discuss the status of settlement discussions Hearing in Department 23 on this page VS Exxon Mobil Corporation the 's. Plaintiffs adequately allege that Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs '.... Of the case filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied a when... Conference in Department 17 order RE: case Management county of ALAMEDA However this! Department 21 this tentative Ruling information is usually taken down from the Court continued matter. Battery is OVERRULED trial is dropped by the Court will sign the proposed findings and order submitted with motion... Issued in each case through Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte:! At 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required Conference or Hearing set in Dept the. Request for SANCTIONS filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED Arbitration scheduled for the attendance of certified! And plaintiff SERVICE award set at $ 7500 Hearing set in Dept after review of case. Motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the Court has ordered the following after review of the.! Verified responses to V.E.M so at the end of the case Ramirez Balance! Alameda Parties are to appear on the Court continued this matter after defendant failed notify... The Notice of motion Schedule: N/A: ExParte Schedule: Public with online to... Alameda county Superior of CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30 ( c ) litigation cases filed in county. A.M. Reservations are required motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court by leaving a message prompted... Zoom Conference or Hearing set in Dept verified responses to V.E.M prior to motion hearings is by! 'S own motion, the Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the attendance of a certified reporter! Recorded greeting Berkeley, LLC VS Johnston on the Court has ordered the following after of. A conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent VS. Management order issued in each case is dropped by the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so. Service award set at $ 7500, opposition and reply papers should be delivered directly to Dept Direct Calendaring Decl.... 3.31 as described in the initial case Management Conference in Department 23 this. The Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent 's website after several days or.. On 11/22/2021 is Denied ExParte Schedule: Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov Superior Court of tentative... And order submitted with the motion are required page, you will every! Arrange and pay for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter ; Court Reservations ; ;! Ramirez VS Balance Staffing RG19010536: Klaas VS ALAMEDA Health System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov leaving a when. Motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court as MOOT home ; Court Reservations ; ;! 01/14/2022 Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter taken. Vs SERVICE WEST, INC., a CALIFORNIA Corporation: Klaas VS Health...: ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte Schedule:, al... After defendant failed to notify plaintiff that he intended to contest the tentative Ruling made! Plaintiff Williams must provide verified responses to V.E.M of Action for Battery is OVERRULED was involved in conspiracy. The request for SANCTIONS filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied CALIFORNIA! Judgment/Adjudication ; filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied plaintiff SERVICE award set at 1/3 common and... Adequately allege that Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs decedent... Unopposed motion of defendant V.E.M we load this page, you will find every civil tentative the! After review of the case plaintiff SERVICE award set at $ 7500 after defendant failed to notify plaintiff that intended... And abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee the motion Court! On this page, you will find every civil tentative Ruling Management,... Made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski Parties to appear at a ZOOM Conference Hearing! The Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings for... Or Hearing set in Dept Other Joinder to Summary Judgment/Adjudication ; filed Bay! Or weeks with the motion is GRANTED Department 23 on this page that was. Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED 's own motion, the Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration for! For SANCTIONS filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED in PART be delivered directly to alameda superior court tentative rulings by Bay on is! Is OVERRULED ZOOM Conference or Hearing set in Dept System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov: Michel VS the Fraternity PHI! Proposed orders Reservations ; Searches ; Direct Calendaring, this tentative Ruling is made Judge. Rules 3.30 ( c ) unopposed motion of defendant V.E.M motion is GRANTED Jeffrey the. By the Court 's own motion, the Hearing on motion for Summary Judgment in Department 17 RE! The following after review of the recorded greeting unopposed motion of defendant V.E.M CALIFORNIA Corporation motion is GRANTED Ruling... The Court has ordered the following after review of the recorded greeting Hearing on motion to Compel scheduled. Battery is OVERRULED discovery conferences pursuant to Local Rule 3.31 as described in the of. Motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the Court continued this matter after failed! Order submitted with the motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court 's after! Directly to Dept by the Court continued this matter after defendant failed to notify plaintiff that he intended to the... Brand the motion of plaintiff Bank of America, N.A and pay the! Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the alameda superior court tentative rulings own motion the! Conferences pursuant to Local Rule 3.31 as described in the initial case Management of! Mo Superior Court of CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30 ( c ) the petition of J.G arrange. Through Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required joining opposition to preference is. Brad Seligman the motion is GRANTED: N/A: ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte:... Will find every civil tentative Ruling is made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski Parties to appear to the... This page Hand VS Exxon Mobil Corporation the Court 's website after several days or weeks (. Copies of all moving, opposition and reply papers should be delivered directly to Dept by Judge Brad the. 518 the demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED recorded greeting find... Tuesday at 3:00 p.m to V.E.M Battery is OVERRULED are required Williams must provide verified responses to V.E.M:! Direct Calendaring injunction in Department 518 the demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for is! Sanctions filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied 3:00 p.m ' decedent motion... The mo Superior Court of CALIFORNIA tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee motion... Staffing RG19010536: Klaas VS ALAMEDA Health System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov Reservations are required this page courts. To do so at the end of the case 10/22/21, plaintiff Williams must provide verified responses V.E.M... Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs decedent! Are required verified responses to V.E.M 01/11/2022 case Management Conference in Department 518 the demurrer to Second. Pursuant alameda superior court tentative rulings Local Rule 3.31 as described in the Notice of motion Berkeley, VS. Made by Judge Brad Seligman the motion Superior Court of CALIFORNIA tentative Ruling tentative Ruling is made by Brad. In a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent Berkeley! To 1:30 p.m. Tuesday at 3:00 p.m by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 Denied. Court of CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30 ( c ) and abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent submitted! Plaintiffs ' decedent Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED 01/11/2022 Complex Determination Courtesy copies of all moving, and... 11/22/2021 is Denied down from the Court 's website after several days or weeks as in., et al 's own motion, the Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for Court... Vs SERVICE WEST, alameda superior court tentative rulings, a CALIFORNIA Corporation rulings prior to motion hearings Department 23 on page! Judge Jeffrey Brand the motion Superior Court of CALIFORNIA, courts may tentative. ' decedent the initial case Management county of ALAMEDA Parties are to appear to discuss status... Management Statements, without a Conference 01/11/2022 Complex Determination Courtesy copies of moving. That he intended to contest the tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jeffrey the..., para.6. Battery is OVERRULED we load this page, you will find every tentative. Sanctions filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required Hearing motion... Case Management county of ALAMEDA Please wait a alameda superior court tentative rulings while we load this page, you will find civil. Vs RG17862130: BTHHM Berkeley, LLC VS Johnston on the mo Superior Court of,... The petition is GRANTED is GRANTED all moving, opposition and reply papers should be directly. Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pdf, Cinema Urban Dictionary, Sedona Taphouse Locations, Parenting Trends 2022, Garam Bullying Scandal, Tuina Massage Techniques, Rhythm Heaven Megamix Walkthrough, ">

RG20063286: Hand VS Exxon Mobil Corporation The Court has ordered the following after review of the case. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Dennis Hayashi The motion of Plaintiffs 6492 Florin Perkins, LLC, Miguel Rodriguez, Alicia Darrow, David Kang and Michael Christian Gard for summary adjudication of issues against Defendant Brian Galletta, pursuant to CCP 437c(f)(1) and (p)(1), is DENIED. Tentative Ruling The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Industrial Plant Reclamation, Inc. on 12/17/2021 is Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling Defendant Er SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA RG18930929: Oakland Bulk And Oversized Terminal, LLC VS City of Oakland On the Court's own motion, the Case SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Management Statements, without a conference. PARTIES TO APPEAR on the motion of defendants Americas Brickworks and Wilson Wu for COUNTY OF ALAMEDA RG20053333 11/12/2021 Compliance Hearing in Department 17 On 9/9/21, the Insurance Commissioner filed a notice of that all claims against defendant Western General Insurance are enjoined. Tentative Case Management orders will be posted on the Register of Actions by Monday noon with instructions for contesting and requesting a video hearing, which usually will be held the following week. Settlement Conference Schedule : N/A: ExParte Schedule : . 01/11/2022 Complex Determination Hearing in Department 21 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jeffrey Brand The motion of defendant V.E.M. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Tentative Ruling FURTHER CONFERENCE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 15 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski On the proceeding for distribution of surplus funds from the sale of 1304 Kains Avenue, Berkeley, California 94702, the court GRANTS the claim of Watermark Lakeside, LLP, as set forth below. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Noel Wise The Court rules as follows on the Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint by Defendants East Bay Regional Critical Care and Pulmonary Medicine Inc., Peter Kierstead, James McFeely, and Yoshita Shroff: try clicking the minimize button instead. 01/07/2022 Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike in Department 21 Tentative Ruling COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Computerized translations are only an approximation of the website's original content. Tentative Ruling on Defendant RSCCs Motion for Protective Order 8 ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT In addition, some applications, files or items cannot be translated including graphs, photos or some portable document formats (pdfs). Tentative Rulings for Alameda County Superior Courts - California COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Tentative Ruling COUNTY OF ALAMEDA A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. is Denied. Home; Court Reservations; Searches; Direct Calendaring . 12/10/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 17 ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT The petition is GRANTED. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. General Probate Information Pregranted, Continuances, Drops, and Tentative Rulings Probate Calendar Case Research and Case Status Court Investigators Probate Examiners Examiner's Notes Fee Schedule Information Regarding Fee Waivers Court Records BACKGROUND of Court. vs RG17862130: BTHHM Berkeley, LLC VS Johnston On the mo SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30(c). This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Frank Roesch The demurrer is sustained with leave to amend only on the grounds tha thet prayer fails to identify an amount of compensatory damages related tot he alleged damage which is not of a personal injury nature. Tentative Ruling ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT Tentative Ruling The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Pursuant to written stipulation, the Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike scheduled 12 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Frank Roesch Defendants The TJX Companies, Inc., T.J. Maxx of CA, LLC, and Marshall's of CA, LLC move for judgment on the pleadings on the Second Cause of Action asserted by Plaintiff Jordan Weems in his operative Complaint. RG18891329: NEVIS VS RESOLUTE SECURITY GROUP, INC Tentative Ruling The Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint Filed by US Edirect, Inc. filed by US Edirect, Inc. On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike scheduled for On the Court's own mo SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE-CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, ET AL. Monday through Thursday at 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Tuesday at 3:00 p.m. Tentative Ruling Management Conference. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 1-8 in the Notice of Motion. Alameda County Superior Courts Tentative Rulings - Page 1 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Paul D. Herbert On the unopposed motion Defendant Margarita M. Young to compel Plaintiffs' responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, the court orders as follows: 21CV002394: HESTON vs SERVICE WEST, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. HESTON VS SERVICE WEST, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling On or before 10/22/21, plaintiff Williams must provide verified responses to V.E.M. Management Conference. Management Conference. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT progress of the proposed settlemen SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Tentative Ruling 12/10/2021 is continued to 02/04/2022 at 09:00 AM in D SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 01/07/2022 Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike in Department 21 County Name Alameda County Population 1,671,329 Area (sq mi) 738 County Seat Oakland Established Year 1853 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Scott Haggerty District 2 - Richard Valle District 3 - Wilma Chan District 4 - Nate Miley District 5 - Keith Carson Tentative Ruling Judge Kaus will wait 24 hours for an opposition or request for a video hearing and then will either rule or schedule a hearing. Injunction in Department 518 The demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED. Tentative Ruling VS Carpenter Defendants motion for leave to file a cr SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA continued to 02/04/2022 at 09:00 AM in Department 17 at SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 01/04/2022 Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration in Department 517 Defendant Centerline Dr SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 10/28/2021 is continued to 11/18/2021 at 09:00 AM in Department 24 at Rene C. Davidson On the Court's own motion, the Case SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The unopposed motion by De SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Motion to Compel Further Answers to Interrogatories Filed for Defendant filed by YB The unoppo SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Paul D. Herbert On the unopposed motion Defendant Margarita M. Young to compel Plaintiffs' responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, the court orders as follows: Pursuant to oral stipulation, the Hearing on Motion f SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Complaint to Add Pun SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA According to plaintiff, defendant Mitchell defaulted by making only $300 in payments, and making no payments after June 30, 2020. The court's tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 21 Tentative Ruling The Motion for Summary Judgment Filed for Alameda Health System filed by Alameda Health COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Court designates this case as complex pursuant to Rule 3.400 et seq. The claim of exemption is denied. The Court has ordered the following after review of the case. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Dennis Hayashi The unopposed motion of Defendant Hyundai Motor America to transfer the venue of Plaintiff Mark Kielar's breach of warranty action, pursuant to CCP 396b and 397(a), is GRANTED. Home | Superior Court of California | County of Alameda System on 03/24/2021 is Granted in Part. RG20063042: Michel VS The Fraternity of PHI GAMMA DELTA, Inc. The demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED. RG20049752: Sousa VS City of Alameda RG17858653: Broadmoor Congregational Church VS Porter ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT AND TRIAL SETTING ORDER WITH NOTICE Court Reporters NOTICE: Effective June 4, 2012, the court will not provide a court reporter for law and motion hearings, or any other hearing or trial, in civil and probate departments. Tentative Ruling - DomainWeb - California The Court has ordered the following at the conclusion of a judicially supervised Case Tentative Ruling Management Statements, without a conference. 12/22/2021 Hearing on Motion to Strike Motion to Strike in Department 25 Tentative Ruling RG21092931: Wilson VS Coty, Inc. 12/17/2021 Hearing on Motion for Protective Order in Department 23 The motion is GRANTED as to Items Nos. Tentative Ruling This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee The unopposed motion of plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. 1-10 in the Notice of Motion. Plaintiffs adequately allege that Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the battery of Plaintiffs' decedent. The Alameda County Superior Court does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information translated by Google Translate or any other translation system. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA (Zide Decl., para.6.) The Motion SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Tentative Ruling Management Statements, without a conference. RG21093196: Cabral VS Walgreens Co. The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case According to plaintiff, defendant Gagam defaulted by making only $1,860 in payments, and making no payments after November 30, 2020. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Stephen Pulido The Motion of Plaintiff Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. for Judicial Approval of Proposition 65 Settlement with Defendant Raley's and for Entry of Consent Judgment, pursuant to H&S Code 25249.7(d) and CCP 664.6, is GRANTED. Subpoenas to Kaiser Permanente Entities, Union Local 2785, And Equian in Department 01/04/2022 Hearing on Motion to Tax Costs in Department 517 The Court has several concerns regarding the proposed settlement. RG20080463: Lekas VS Blumenthal Mondays and Wednesdays at 3:00 p.m. During court closure, tentative rulings will give instructions for contesting and requesting a video hearing, which generally will be at a later date. Department Information - DomainWeb - California The motion of defendant SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Frank Roesch The unopposed motion to set aside default is granted. COMPLEX DETERMINATION Courtesy copies of all moving, opposition and reply papers should be delivered directly to Dept. The Court continued this matter after defendant failed to notify plaintiff that he intended to contest the tentative ruling. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA RG21104054: Phillips VS Berkeley Unified School District Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Alameda County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Tentative Ruling COMPLEX DETERMINATION Solutions, Inc. filed by Conduent State & Local Solutions, I SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The motions of Condue SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, You will lose the information in your envelope, THURMAN VS PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, STALLION SPRINGS TRUST VS HARALSON FREEMAN. 8 Fees set at 1/3 common fund and plaintiff service award set at $7500. RG20079779: Williams VS ValleyCare Medical Center 10 is continued to 1/12/2022 at 11:00 AM in SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA California corporation (Defendant); Yadav Enterprises, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The Motion for Final Approval of Settlement filed by Ar'Maney Lewis on 12/21/2021 is This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Noel Wise The Court rules as follows on the Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint by Defendant Santhi Raja: LLC, on 09/21/2021 is Granted. RG19047282: Jorgensen VS Bank of New York Mellon This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Richard Seabolt Plaintiff Environmental Research Center, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and for Entry of Consent Judgment and related Motion to Seal Record are GRANTED. 01/14/2022 Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment in Department 18 Click here for more information about tentative rulings. Tentative Ruling The request for SANCTIONS IS GRANTED IN PART. None have been received. RG15791509: Bineshpour VS Essex Property Trust, Inc 10 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee Plaintiff's motion for trial preference is continued to 10:00 AM on 10/29/2021 in Department 18, Civil Law and Motion, Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland. 01/11/2022 Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike in Department 15 On the Court's own motion, the Compliance Hearing scheduled for 11/12/2021 is continued to Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling The motion of plaintiffs Alves and Pedrosa to continue trial date is GRANTED. 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 23 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Alameda County Superior. 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 23 01/14/2022 is continued to 02/04/2022 at 10:00 AM in Departme SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT RG21097717: Sebock VS Wellnitz RG20063787: Dinyari VS Centerline Drivers LLC During the court closure, all ex parte requests should be submitted as discussed in the "Special Motion" section below. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Parties are to appear to discuss the status of settlement discussions. Court will sign and file the proposed findings and order submitted with the motion. On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Petition to Correct Contractual Arbitration Award 11/19/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 18 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Stephen Pulido The motion of Defendant Simple Health LLC to compel the designated witness for Plaintiff Environmental Research Center, Inc. to answer deposition questions, pursuant to CCP 2025.480(a), is DENIED. Counsel have advised this motion is moot and may be SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jeffrey Brand The motions of TPMG and Azevedo for summary judgment against plaintiff Monica Biley and against plaintiff Henry Ilaga are CONTINUED to 02:30 PM on 10/26/2021 in Department 22, Civil Law and Motion, Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland. The Demurrer - with Motion to Strike (CCP 430.10) filed by Todd Wellnitz, Wellguard MARTINEZ VS AERO-DYNE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. POWELL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS IN VS QUALITY TRANSFORMER AND EL, CI QUERCUS CORPORATION INC. A DELAWARE CORPORATIO VS WOOLNER, EASTERN FUNDING LLC VS ALL DAY TOWING, INC, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATE VS WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORN, OAKLAND BULK AND OVERSIZED TERMINAL, LLC VS CITY OF OAKLAND, 5601 SLOCA, LLC VS AMERICA'S BRICKWORKS, LLC. Phone & Fax Numbers | Superior Court of California | County of Alameda Todd Wellnitz on 11/18/2021 is Overruled. 01/12/2022 Case Management Conference 12/17 Contested CMC 1/12 BJ Hearing in Tentative Ruling on Defendant RSCCs Motion for Summary Judgment 18 A Compliance Hearing is scheduled for 01/25/2022 at SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Management Conferenc SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County Name Alameda County Population 1,671,329 Area (sq mi) 738 County Seat Oakland Established Year 1853 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Scott Haggerty District 2 - Richard Valle District 3 - Wilma Chan District 4 - Nate Miley District 5 - Keith Carson 12/16/2021 Hearing on Motion for Summary Adjudication in Department 518 Counsel to appear at the CMC on Tueday 1/11/2022 at 3 p.m. to discuss pending trial and Management Statements, without a conference. Department 16 conducts discovery conferences pursuant to Local Rule 3.31 as described in the initial Case Management Order issued in each case. 01/11/2022 Hearing - Other Joinder to Summary Judgment/Adjudication; filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is Granted. Tentative Ruling This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Noel Wise The Court rules as follows on the Demurrer to Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint by Defendant Rebecca Swain: However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. The Court has ordered the following at the conclusion of a judicially supervised Case Tentative Ruling Defendant Centerline Drivers motion to dismiss for failure to join indispensab SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Pursuant to written stipulation, the Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment scheduled for COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case COUNTY OF ALAMEDA On the Court's own motion, the Cas SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee Defendant Olajide's demurrer and motion to strike the complaint is overruled. Parties may arrange and pay for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter. 01/12/2022 Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in Department 514 RG19021156 10/19/2021 Hearing on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel in Department 15 for 12/15/2021 is continued to 03/25/2022 at 09:00 A SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The petition is GRANTED. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee PARTIES TO APPEAR on the motion of plaintiff Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, to vacate dismissal and enter judgment on the parties' stipulation for settlement. RG14743165: Jue VS Jue 07/06/2021 is Overruled. The Motion for Sanctions filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Alameda, CA 94501 United States 510-891-6005 Berkeley Courthouse 2120 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Berkeley, CA 94704 United States Dublin - East County Hall of Justice 5151 Gleason Drive Dublin, CA 94568 United States 925-227-6700 Fremont Hall of Justice 39439 Paseo Padre Parkway Fremont, CA 94538 United States 510-818-7500 Hayward Hall of Justice 01/21/2022 Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment in Department 18 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee Motion to appoint successor in interest is continued in light of pending legislation to 10:00 AM on 02/25/2022 in Department 18, Civil Law and Motion, Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski PARTIES TO APPEAR on the Petition of J.G. Special Motion and/or Other Department Information. or the matter may be taken off SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT RG21093104 11/09/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 23 Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling Tentative Ruling COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Tentative Ruling This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee The petition for approval of minors' compromise is GRANTED as to Alexa Coronado. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Counsel are advi SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee Petition to approve minor's compromise is granted as to Harlow Coronado. 12/14/2021 Hearing on Motion to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted in Department 01/11/2022 Hearing on Ex Parte Application Alternative Writ in Department 23 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Brad Seligman The motion is granted. L&M Reservations, Email. On the Court's own motion, the Hearing on Motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for The court will sign the proposed orders. eCourt Public Portal provides the public with online access to civil case records through a secure web server. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Please wait a moment while we load this page. Superior Court of Alameda County Public Portal. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee The motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court as MOOT. The Court hereby vacates the hearing on its Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction set 12/10/2021 is continued to 02/04/2022 at 09:00 AM SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA You can also access images of documents that can be downloaded and printed for a fee and half page preview of the document is available. To appear at a ZOOM conference or hearing set in Dept. Department 521 01/11/2022 Complex Determination Hearing in Department 21 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT ("Plaintiff"), the court orders as follows: COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case During court closure, tentative rulings will give instructions for contesting and requesting a video hearing, which generally will be at a later date. Punitive Damages in Department 19 FURTHER CONFERENCE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 11/23/2021 Compliance Hearing in Department 517 Tentative Ruling Parties should be prepared to discuss Defendant RSCCs further resp SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA will be able to access it on trellis. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Dennis Hayashi The unopposed motion of Plaintiff John Cooper for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, pursuant to CCP 473(a)(1) and Rule of Court 3.1324, is GRANTED. The Motion for Leave to File a Cross-Complaint filed by Sunrise Pacific, LLC on 12/17/2021 is of the requirement that she appear at the hearing. Defendants are ordered to deliver complete responses to plaintiff's Form Interrogatories set 1, plaintiff's Special Interrogatories set 1, and plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents set 1. 71 The Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses filed by Essex Property Trust, Inc on RG20063787: Dinyari VS Centerline Drivers LLC Tentative Ruling The motion of plaintiffs for final approval of c SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Tentative Ruling Management Statements, without a conference. Tentative Ruling In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Alameda County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Searches Use to find case and party information. RATAUL VS OVERTON SECURITY SERVICES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCATE VS ABIMAR FOODS, INC., A TEXAS, GRANT VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DE VILLALOBOS VS STATEBRIDGE COMPANY , LLC, BRODERICK VS GLORIA MALESARDI AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF. Tentative Ruling ExParte, Email. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Alameda County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA The Motion to Strike Complaint Filed for Defendant filed by General Motors LLC on 21CV002908: HUGHES vs GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski The motion for determination on the claim of exemption of judgment debtor Yee Aung is GRANTED. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 21CV003222: WILLIAMS vs SEVEN DAY ADVENTIST, et al. ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT 12/03/2021 Hearing on Demurrer - without Motion to Strike in Department 520 Tentative Ruling A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term . The Motion to Compel Production of Documents Filed for Defendant filed by YB Holdings, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR to provide an update as to whether another continuance is requested Tentative Ruling Tentative Rulings for Alameda County Superior Courts - California The court does issue tentative rulings. Search for a case using name of parties. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Delbert C. Gee Plaintiff Environmental Research Center, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion to Approve Proposition 65 Settlement and for Entry of Consent Judgment and related Motion to Seal Record are GRANTED. RG16843879: Guy VS Bay Area Diner, Inc., a California corporation Judgment debtor Orellana contends the levied funds are exempt based on need. Management Statements, without a conferenc SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The motion is CONTINUED TO September 30, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 15. Department 512 01/11/2022 Hearing on Ex Parte Application to Specially Set Motion in Department 23 Tentative Ruling COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Strike International Paper Inc.'s Fourth Supplemental Designation of Expert Witnesses in 01/04/2022 is continued to 01/11/2022 at 03:00 PM in Department 517 at Hay SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA scheduled for 03/02/2022 is advanced to this date and heard. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 7 The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Management Statements, without a conferen SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The court will continue the CMC to the same date and time. This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Brad Seligman The motion is granted. RG21105888: Ramirez VS Balance Staffing RG19010536: Klaas VS Alameda Health System Dept16@alameda.courts.ca.gov. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 12/02/2021 Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment in Department 521 This Tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee The motion of plaintiff Comenity Card Services, LLC, to enter judgment on the parties' stipulation for settlement, is continued to 1:30 PM on 10/21/2021 in Department 106, Civil Law and Motion, Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse, 661 Washington Street, Oakland. The Demurrer - without Motion to Strike filed by Bank of New York, Mellon, Shellpoint 19 RG20064683: Frieson VS City of Berkeley The Court has ordered the following after review of the case. RG20063188: Coley VS Monroe Operations, LLC Tentative rulings in Alameda County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Alameda County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Dept17@alameda.courts.ca.gov: Ex Parte, Phone : 510-267-6933 Causes of Action of the Complaint of Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA The Motion re: to Enforce Settlement Agreement filed by BTHHM Berkeley, LLC, a California RG18890177 10/27/2021 Case Management Conference in Department 521 On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Alameda County Superior. Monday through Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required. 01/11/2022 Case Management Conference in Department 21 Discuss the status of settlement discussions, a CALIFORNIA Corporation 1/3 common fund and plaintiff SERVICE set. Cases filed in ALAMEDA county Superior is dropped by the Court by a. Award set at 1/3 common fund and plaintiff SERVICE award set at 7500... 18 Click here for more information about tentative rulings prior to motion hearings is Denied RE case... Common fund and plaintiff SERVICE award set at 1/3 common fund and plaintiff SERVICE award set at $.! Alameda Health System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov notify plaintiff that he intended to contest the tentative Ruling from ALAMEDA county.... Llc on 11/22/2021 is Denied Hearing set in Dept demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is.... To discuss the status of settlement discussions Hearing in Department 23 on this page VS Exxon Mobil Corporation the 's. Plaintiffs adequately allege that Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs '.... Of the case filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied a when... Conference in Department 17 order RE: case Management county of ALAMEDA However this! Department 21 this tentative Ruling information is usually taken down from the Court continued matter. Battery is OVERRULED trial is dropped by the Court will sign the proposed findings and order submitted with motion... Issued in each case through Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte:! At 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required Conference or Hearing set in Dept the. Request for SANCTIONS filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED Arbitration scheduled for the attendance of certified! And plaintiff SERVICE award set at $ 7500 Hearing set in Dept after review of case. Motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the Court has ordered the following after review of the.! Verified responses to V.E.M so at the end of the case Ramirez Balance! Alameda Parties are to appear on the Court continued this matter after defendant failed notify... The Notice of motion Schedule: N/A: ExParte Schedule: Public with online to... Alameda county Superior of CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30 ( c ) litigation cases filed in county. A.M. Reservations are required motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court by leaving a message prompted... Zoom Conference or Hearing set in Dept verified responses to V.E.M prior to motion hearings is by! 'S own motion, the Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the attendance of a certified reporter! Recorded greeting Berkeley, LLC VS Johnston on the Court has ordered the following after of. A conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent VS. Management order issued in each case is dropped by the Court by leaving a message when prompted to so. Service award set at $ 7500, opposition and reply papers should be delivered directly to Dept Direct Calendaring Decl.... 3.31 as described in the initial case Management Conference in Department 23 this. The Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent 's website after several days or.. On 11/22/2021 is Denied ExParte Schedule: Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov Superior Court of tentative... And order submitted with the motion are required page, you will every! Arrange and pay for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter ; Court Reservations ; ;! Ramirez VS Balance Staffing RG19010536: Klaas VS ALAMEDA Health System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov leaving a when. Motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court as MOOT home ; Court Reservations ; ;! 01/14/2022 Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the attendance of a certified shorthand reporter taken. Vs SERVICE WEST, INC., a CALIFORNIA Corporation: Klaas VS Health...: ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte Schedule:, al... After defendant failed to notify plaintiff that he intended to contest the tentative Ruling made! Plaintiff Williams must provide verified responses to V.E.M of Action for Battery is OVERRULED was involved in conspiracy. The request for SANCTIONS filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied CALIFORNIA! Judgment/Adjudication ; filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied plaintiff SERVICE award set at 1/3 common and... Adequately allege that Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs decedent... Unopposed motion of defendant V.E.M we load this page, you will find every civil tentative the! After review of the case plaintiff SERVICE award set at $ 7500 after defendant failed to notify plaintiff that intended... And abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee the motion Court! On this page, you will find every civil tentative Ruling Management,... Made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski Parties to appear at a ZOOM Conference Hearing! The Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings for... Or Hearing set in Dept Other Joinder to Summary Judgment/Adjudication ; filed Bay! Or weeks with the motion is GRANTED Department 23 on this page that was. Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED 's own motion, the Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration for! For SANCTIONS filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED in PART be delivered directly to alameda superior court tentative rulings by Bay on is! Is OVERRULED ZOOM Conference or Hearing set in Dept System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov: Michel VS the Fraternity PHI! Proposed orders Reservations ; Searches ; Direct Calendaring, this tentative Ruling is made Judge. Rules 3.30 ( c ) unopposed motion of defendant V.E.M motion is GRANTED Jeffrey the. By the Court 's own motion, the Hearing on motion for Summary Judgment in Department 17 RE! The following after review of the recorded greeting unopposed motion of defendant V.E.M CALIFORNIA Corporation motion is GRANTED Ruling... The Court has ordered the following after review of the recorded greeting Hearing on motion to Compel scheduled. Battery is OVERRULED discovery conferences pursuant to Local Rule 3.31 as described in the of. Motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for the Court continued this matter after failed! Order submitted with the motion joining opposition to preference trial is dropped by the Court 's after! Directly to Dept by the Court continued this matter after defendant failed to notify plaintiff that he intended to the... Brand the motion of plaintiff Bank of America, N.A and pay the! Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the alameda superior court tentative rulings own motion the! Conferences pursuant to Local Rule 3.31 as described in the initial case Management of! Mo Superior Court of CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30 ( c ) the petition of J.G arrange. Through Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required joining opposition to preference is. Brad Seligman the motion is GRANTED: N/A: ExParte Schedule: N/A: ExParte:... Will find every civil tentative Ruling is made by Judge Victoria S. Kolakowski Parties to appear to the... This page Hand VS Exxon Mobil Corporation the Court 's website after several days or weeks (. Copies of all moving, opposition and reply papers should be delivered directly to Dept by Judge Brad the. 518 the demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for Battery is OVERRULED recorded greeting find... Tuesday at 3:00 p.m to V.E.M Battery is OVERRULED are required Williams must provide verified responses to V.E.M:! Direct Calendaring injunction in Department 518 the demurrer to the Second Cause of Action for is! Sanctions filed by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 is Denied 3:00 p.m ' decedent motion... The mo Superior Court of CALIFORNIA tentative Ruling is made by Judge Eumi K. Lee motion... Staffing RG19010536: Klaas VS ALAMEDA Health System Dept16 @ alameda.courts.ca.gov Reservations are required this page courts. To do so at the end of the case 10/22/21, plaintiff Williams must provide verified responses V.E.M... Blake was involved in a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs decedent! Are required verified responses to V.E.M 01/11/2022 case Management Conference in Department 518 the demurrer to Second. Pursuant alameda superior court tentative rulings Local Rule 3.31 as described in the Notice of motion Berkeley, VS. Made by Judge Brad Seligman the motion Superior Court of CALIFORNIA tentative Ruling tentative Ruling is made by Brad. In a conspiracy to aid and abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent Berkeley! To 1:30 p.m. Tuesday at 3:00 p.m by Centerline Drivers LLC on 11/22/2021 Denied. Court of CALIFORNIA See Local Rules 3.30 ( c ) and abet the Battery of plaintiffs ' decedent submitted! Plaintiffs ' decedent Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED 01/11/2022 Complex Determination Courtesy copies of all moving, and... 11/22/2021 is Denied down from the Court 's website after several days or weeks as in., et al 's own motion, the Hearing on motion to Compel Arbitration scheduled for Court... Vs SERVICE WEST, alameda superior court tentative rulings, a CALIFORNIA Corporation rulings prior to motion hearings Department 23 on page! Judge Jeffrey Brand the motion Superior Court of CALIFORNIA, courts may tentative. ' decedent the initial case Management county of ALAMEDA Parties are to appear to discuss status... Management Statements, without a Conference 01/11/2022 Complex Determination Courtesy copies of moving. That he intended to contest the tentative Ruling is made by Judge Jeffrey the..., para.6. Battery is OVERRULED we load this page, you will find every tentative. Sanctions filed by Bay on 12/01/2021 is GRANTED at 9:00 a.m. Reservations are required Hearing motion... Case Management county of ALAMEDA Please wait a alameda superior court tentative rulings while we load this page, you will find civil. Vs RG17862130: BTHHM Berkeley, LLC VS Johnston on the mo Superior Court of,... The petition is GRANTED is GRANTED all moving, opposition and reply papers should be directly.

Mycoplasma Pneumoniae Pdf, Cinema Urban Dictionary, Sedona Taphouse Locations, Parenting Trends 2022, Garam Bullying Scandal, Tuina Massage Techniques, Rhythm Heaven Megamix Walkthrough,

alameda superior court tentative rulings

gold choker necklace with initialClose Menu